Johnny's Idea: Asawa -> sawa -> awa

 ASAWA  (asawa ko, mahal ko)

     Mag asawa ang tawag sa dalawang taong pinagsama sa ritwal ng sakal, este.. kasal. Sa harap ng altar mangangako silang dalawa na magsasama sila sa hirap at ginhawa, at kamatayan lang daw ang makapaghihiwalay sa kanila. Dahil sa kanilang pagmamahalan ay magbubunga ang kanilang pagsasama ng mga anak na sabay din nilang palalakihin. Haharapin nila lahat ng problema, pagtaas ng presyo sa kilo ng bigas,mga utang, pambili ng gatas, kakulitan ng mga anak, pagtaba ni misis at pagkalasinggero ni mister. Lahat ng 'yon ay haharapin ng mag asawa.

  -->tanggalin kaya natin ang letter A, tingnan natin kung anu ang mangyayari:

SAWA (sawa na ako sa'yo)

      After 10 years, sa ka tititig ni mister kay misis, mapapansin niyang si misis ay tumataba, 'di na ito gaya ng dati. Ang dati nitong seksing katawan ay nawala na, ang dati nitong malambot na palad ay nababalot na ng makakapal na kalyo. Dahil dito, maghahanap ito ng mas bata, yung mas sexy at ang wedding ring na isinuut ni misis sa kanya noong sila'y kinakasal ay itatago nito para magmistula siyang binata. Madaling araw na siya kung umuwi, parating lasing at ang masaklap pa ay nanakit sa kanyang asawa at mga anak at hahantong na ito sa tuluyan nitong pag iwan sa kanyang pamilya.

    ----> SAWA nalng ang natira, tanggalin naman natin ngayon ang letter S:

AWA (self explanatory)

       Ito nalang ang mararamdaman mu sa mga iniwan ni mister na ngayon ay nagpapakasawa sa bago niyang karelasyon habang ang kanyang misis ay halos maputulan ng hininga dahil pinagsabay nito ang pagtatrabaho at pag aalaga sa mga anak. Awa dahil wala ng kilalaning matinong ama ang mga bata.

Johnny's Idea: Premarital Sex

Let me begin with this....;
     Maraming mga kabataan ngayon ang maagang nakakapasok sa butas...este na iengage sa sex, premarital sex to be specific. Sabi nga nila, sa edad na 18 to 20 eh masyadong mainit ang katawan ng isang teenager...which is true...sabihin na nating mahilig lang talaga tayo mag explore ( parang si Dora) at mag experiment ( parang si Jimmy Neutron) pero di na natin naaalala na napilosopo at naiwalangbahala na pala natin na meron palang nagmamatyag sa atin, nakikita bawat kilos natin at naririnig bawat salita natin ( parang si Big brother)...uhm Im talking about God... Base on my own experience, mahirap naman talagang iresist yan eh, let me base it on science, natural na sa katawan ng tao na mag react sa mga bagay na yan, sabi nga sa biology na an organism respond to a certain stimuli, pero kaya naman yang iresist magkaroon ka lang ng self control.
     Sa religious context naman tayo, sex or sexual intercourse is very sacred, it must be done in the context of marriage....hahaixt ..alam nyu naexperience ku na yan..nalulungkot lang aku kasi sa panahong mahanap ku na ang babaeng makakasama ku habang buhay hindi ko na maipagmamayabang sa kanya na hindi ku pa yan nararanasan. Pinagdarasal ku nalang na kung sino man siya, ay sana maintindihan niya ako.
 I hope you get my point. ^^

Johnny's Idea: "Love is my Game"

Eto yung motto ng mga timers, timers? yung mga taong di lang talaga makontento sa isa. Two timers, Three timers, kung ano pa sila, tinawag silang timers kasi sa abilidad nilang pagsabayin ang maraming karelasyon (abilidad pala yun). Uhm , di ku ito sinasabi kasi galit aku sa mga timers, sinasabi ko lang ito kasi nagtataka lang talaga ako kung bakit sila ganun, hmmm malaksa lang tlaga siguro ang sexual desires nila kaya naghahanap sila ng iba't ibang karelasyon just to satisfy their desires.(whatever) Actually biktima rin aku ng isang two timer, uhm...di lang pala yun two timer, maramihan yung sa kanya, parang siyang computer (multitasking), anyway huwag na nating pag usapan ang masalimuot kung nakaraan, sabahin nalang natin na (sige na nga) galit aku sa kanila... so eto na yung time para batikusin ku sila...heheheh joke lang... anyway, it's their choice to be like that.
  
      Basta ang tingin ku lang sa kanila eh parang isang batang paslit na pinagsasawaan ang isang laruan, at kung nagsawa na eh papalitan na naman ng panibago. Meron din naman siguro silang rason kung bakit sila ganyan...(hmmm)marahil....uhm mern lang silang hinahanap na bagay na di nila nakita sa kanilang mga magulang. Ayon kay Charlene Lozano, may mga two timers daw kasi meron lang daw talagang tao na madaling magsawa, at kung ang isang babae daw ay maghanap ng iba, meron pa daw siyang hinahanap sa isang lalake na mas better (gi quote jud si charlene hah..heheh )
      Marami pang ibang rason kung bakit sila ganun at kung anu ang mga rason na yun eh...yan ang di ku pa alam, di ku pa kasi naranasang mang two time, at di na rin ako mgababalak mang two time, bad kaya yun. Iniisip ku kasi kung anu ang mafefeel ng isang babae kung ginawa ku sa kanya ang bagay na 'yan, and another thing alam ko rin ang feeling nang maganun...siyempre ...di kaayaaya.
      Bagu ku ito tapusin....ito lang ang masasabi ku, ang pagkakaroon ng karelasyon (gf or bf) ay parang training ground  mu narin in preparation to marriage life....and if nagawa mung mang two time sa panahong di pa kayo kasal, how much more kung  kasal ka na, anyway, yun ay opinion ku lang naman, mag dedepende pa rin 'yun sa principle ng isang tao about that matter. Basta at  the early stage of opposite sex relationship or any form of relationship, being faithful or loyal to your partner is the best policy, kahit na hindi pa siya loyal sa'yo and unfair man ang tingin mu dito o hindi....

----Lockheart

Johnny's Idea : GOD, SCIENCE, and our origin

Di ba kayo nagtataka kung saan galing ang mga bagay na makikita natin sa ating paligid (eg:, mga hayop, halaman, at tayo mismo), sa mga nagdaang siglo maraming  nagsulputang theories kung saan tayo nanggaling, isa na dito ang theory ni Charles Darwin na tayo daw ay galing sa ungguy...(ehem) di naman sa ayaw ku sa theory niya pero payag ba kayo sa theory na galing daw tayo sa ungguy... C'mon....ang layo kaya(nakaharap nga ako ngayon sa salamin eh) ,uhm pero isa lang yon sa mga theory na naformulate ng TAO....at sa dami nun, ito nalang ang iniisip ko, ang Diyos na ang pinakamagaling na engineer na alam ku, akalain nyu yun, nakagawa lang naman siya ng nilalang na marunong mag-isip at magdesisyon para sa kanyang sarili. Pero alam nyu, konti lang ang nakaka appreciate nun, halos isampal na nga ng kalikasan ang ganda nya sa atin eh, para lang maisip natin na may isang extraordinary force na may kinalaman kung bakit tayo at ang makasalanang mundong ito ay nakalutang sa gitna ng universe.


 Pag usapan naman natin  ang God vs. science, alam nyu sa topic pa lang na yan, masasabi ko na kapag napag uusapan to ng isang grupo ng mga tao ( na nagsasabing open minded daw sila...heheh) eh debate talaga ang patutunguhan.
  When we say science kasi, hindi pa naeexplain ng science ang lahat ng bagay, kaya nga hanggang ngayon hanggang theory palang ang pinapakita ng mga scientist sa atin, kagaya ng sabi ni Darwin na galing daw tayo sa ungguy, (bakit? nakakita ba siya ng isang ape na nag transform patungo sa isang homosapiens?) My point is, science can't even explain why those things (their discoveries and whatsoever) are happening, science can only explain how it is happening. If we base it sa bible eh simple lang ang pakakasabi: ang tao ay galing sa alikabok ...uhmmmm.......anyway ang dalawang panig kasi minsan nagkakaconflict dahil lang sa isang salita.. at yun ay ang FAITH , yun lang kasi ang pinanghahawakan natin na meron talagang Diyos, kahit na wala tayong ANY SENSORY PERCEPTION SA KANYA But if we try to analyze  everything, (na observe ku lang huh) sa bible parang iniexplain nito ang mga bagay in simple ways ( para syang nagbibigay ng clue kung saan talaga tayo galing) while in science , they based it on actual studies.. ^^

--> Lockheart
click this : http://jayz3.blogspot.com/2011/04/god-vs-science.html

God vs. Science

Now unto him that is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think, according to the power that worketh in us, Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen. (Eph 3:20-21)



A Wonderful Way to Preach about OUR ALMIGHTY GOD


God vs. Science'
---------------------


This is worth the read! It gets interesting so please read it to the end...

You will be surprised who the Student was


'Let me explain the problem science has with religion.'
The atheist professor of philosophy pauses before his class and then asks
one of his new students to stand.

'You're a Christian, aren't you, son?'

'Yes sir,' the student says.

'So you believe in God?'

'Absolutely. '

'Is God good?'
'Sure! God's good.'

'Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?'

'Yes'

'Are you good or evil?'

'The Bible says I'm evil.'

The professor grins knowingly. 'Aha! The Bible! He considers for a moment.
'Here's one for you. Let's say there's a sick person over here and you can
cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?'

'Yes sir, I would.'

'So you're good...!'

'I wouldn't say that...'

'But why not say that? You'd help a sick and maimed person if you could.
Most of us would if we could. But God doesn't.'

The student does not answer, so the professor continues. 'He doesn't, does he? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even though he prayed to Jesus to heal him. How is this Jesus good? Can you answer that one?'

The student remains silent. 'No, you can't, can you?' the professor says.
He takes a sip of water from a glass on his desk to give the student time
to relax. 'Let's start again, young fella. Is God good?'

'Er..yes,' the student says.

'Is Satan good?'

The student doesn't hesitate on this one. 'No.'

'Then where does Satan come from?'

The student falters. 'From God'

'That's right. God made Satan, didn't he? Tell me, son. Is there evil in
this world?'

'Yes, sir.'

'Evil's everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything, correct?'

'Yes'

'So who created evil?' The professor continued, 'If God created
everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the
principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil.'

Again, the student has no answer. 'Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?'

The student squirms on his feet. 'Yes.'

'So who created them?'

The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question.
'Who created them?' There is still no answer. Suddenly the lecturer breaks
away to pace in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized. 'Tell
me,' he continues onto another student. 'Do you believe in Jesus Christ,
son?'

The student's voice betrays him and cracks. 'Yes, professor, I do.'

The old man stops pacing. 'Science says you have five senses you use to
identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?'

'No sir. I've never seen Him.'

'Then tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?'

'No, sir, I have not..'

'Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus?
Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?'

'No, sir, I'm afraid I haven't.'

'Yet you still believe in him?'

'Yes'
'According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol,
science says your God doesn't exist... What do you say to that, son?'

'Nothing,' the student replies.. 'I only have my faith.'

'Yes, faith,' the professor repeats. 'And that is the problem science has
with God. There is no evidence, only faith.'

The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a question of His
own. 'Professor, is there such thing as heat? '

' Yes.

'And is there such a thing as cold?'

'Yes, son, there's cold too.'

'No sir, there isn't.'

The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room
suddenly becomes very quiet. The student begins to explain. 'You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but we don't have anything called 'cold'.

We can hit down to 458 degrees below zero, which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than the lowest -458 degrees. Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy. Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it.'

Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom, sounding like a hammer.

'What about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing as darkness?'

'Yes,' the professor replies without hesitation. 'What is night if it
isn't darkness?'

'You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is the absence of
something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing
light, but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it's
called darkness, isn't it? That's the meaning we use to define the word.
In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness
darker, wouldn't you?'

The professor begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be
a good semester. 'So what point are you making, young man?'

'Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to
start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed.'

The professor's face cannot hide his surprise this time. 'Flawed? Can you
explain how?'

'You are working on the premise of duality,' the student explains.. 'You
argue that there is life and then there's death; a good God and a bad God.

You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can't even explain a thought.' 'It uses electricity
and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one.

To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that
death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is not the opposite of
life, just the absence of it.' 'Now tell me, professor. Do you teach your
students that they evolved from a monkey?'

'If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, young man, yes,
of course I do.'

'Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?'

The professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as he realizes
where the argument is going.. A very good semester, indeed.

'Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and
cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?'

The class is in uproar.. The student remains silent until the commotion
has subsided. 'To continue the point you were making earlier to the other
student, let me give you an example of what I mean.' The student looks
around the room. 'Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the
professor's brain?' The class breaks out into laughter. 'Is there anyone
here who has ever heard the professor's brain, felt the professor's brain,
touched or smelt the professor's brain? No one appears to have done so.
So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable
protocol, science says that you have no brain, with all due respect, sir.'
'So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust your lectures,
sir?'

Now the room is silent.. The professor just stares at the student, his
face unreadable. Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man
answers. 'I Guess you'll have to take them on faith.'

'Now, you accept that there is faith, and, in fact, faith exists with
life,' the student continues. 'Now, sir, is there such a thing as evil?'
Now uncertain, the professor responds, 'Of course, there is. We see it
Everyday. It is in the daily example of man's inhumanity to man. It is in
The multitude of crime and violence everywhere in the world. These
manifestations are nothing else but evil..'

To this the student replied, 'Evil does not exist sir, or at least it does
not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like
darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that
comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no
light.'

The professor sat down.

If you read it all the way through and had a smile on your face when you
finished, mail to your friends and family with the title 'God vs. Science'

PS: The student was Albert Einstein.
Albert Einstein wrote a book titled 'God vs. Science' in 1921...

LOVE : scientific basis ^^

Chemical basis

Biological models of sex tend to view love as a mammalian drive, much like hunger or thirst. Helen Fisher, a leading expert in the topic of love, divides the experience of love into three partly overlapping stages: lust, attraction, and attachment. Lust exposes people to others; romantic attraction encourages people to focus their energy on mating; and attachment involves tolerating the spouse (or indeed the child) long enough to rear a child into infancy.

Simplified overview of the chemical basis of love

Lust is the initial passionate sexual desire that promotes mating, and involves the increased release of chemicals such as testosterone and estrogen. These effects rarely last more than a few weeks or months. Attraction is the more individualized and romantic desire for a specific candidate for mating, which develops out of lust as commitment to an individual mate forms. Recent studies in neuroscience have indicated that as people fall in love, the brain consistently releases a certain set of chemicals, including pheromones, dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin, which act in a manner similar to amphetamines, stimulating the brain's pleasure center and leading to side effects such as increased heart rate, loss of appetite and sleep, and an intense feeling of excitement. Research has indicated that this stage generally lasts from one and a half to three years.

Since the lust and attraction stages are both considered temporary, a third stage is needed to account for long-term relationships. Attachment is thebonding that promotes relationships lasting for many years and even decades. Attachment is generally based on commitments such as marriage andchildren, or on mutual friendship based on things like shared interests. It has been linked to higher levels of the chemicals oxytocin and vasopressin to a greater degree than short-term relationships have. Enzo Emanuele and coworkers reported the protein molecule known as the nerve growth factor(NGF) has high levels when people first fall in love, but these return to previous levels after one year.

Psychological basis

Further information: Human bonding

Same-sex marriage in Canada.

Psychology depicts love as a cognitive and social phenomenon. Psychologist Robert Sternberg formulated atriangular theory of love and argued that love has three different components: intimacy, commitment, and passion. Intimacy is a form in which two people share confidences and various details of their personal lives, and is usually shown in friendships and romantic love affairs. Commitment, on the other hand, is the expectation that the relationship is permanent. The last and most common form of love is sexual attraction and passion. Passionate love is shown in infatuation as well as romantic love. All forms of love are viewed as varying combinations of these three components. American psychologist Zick Rubinsought to define love by psychometrics in the 1970s. His work states that three factors constitute love: attachment, caring, and intimacy.

Following developments in electrical theories such as Coulomb's law, which showed that positive and negative charges attract, analogs in human life were developed, such as "opposites attract." Over the last century, research on the nature of human mating has generally found this not to be true when it comes to character and personality—people tend to like people similar to themselves. However, in a few unusual and specific domains, such as immune systems, it seems that humans prefer others who are unlike themselves (e.g., with an orthogonal immune system), since this will lead to a baby that has the best of both worlds. In recent years, various human bonding theories have been developed, described in terms of attachments, ties, bonds, and affinities.

Grandmother and grandchild, Sri Lanka

Some Western authorities disaggregate into two main components, the altruistic and the narcissistic. This view is represented in the works of Scott Peck, whose work in the field of applied psychology explored the definitions of love and evil. Peck maintains that love is a combination of the "concern for the spiritual growth of another," and simple narcissism. In combination, love is an activity, not simply a feeling.

Noted psychologist Eric Fromm also maintained in his book "The art of loving" that love is not merely a feeling but is also actions, and that in fact, the "feeling" of love is superficial in comparison to ones commitment to love via a series of loving actions over time. In this sense, Fromm held that love is ultimately not a feeling at all, but rather is a commitment to, and adherence to, loving actions towards another, ones self, or many others, over a sustained duration. Fromm also described Love as a conscious choice that in its early stages might originate as an involuntary feeling, but which then later no longer depends on those feelings, but rather depends only on conscious commitment.

Comparison of scientific models

Biological models of love tend to see it as a mammalian drive, similar to hunger or thirst. Psychology sees love as more of a social and cultural phenomenon. There are probably elements of truth in both views. Certainly love is influenced by hormones (such as oxytocin), neurotrophins (such as NGF), and pheromones, and how people think and behave in love is influenced by their conceptions of love. The conventional view in biology is that there are two major drives in love: sexual attraction and attachment. Attachment between adults is presumed to work on the same principles that lead an infant to become attached to its mother. The traditional psychological view sees love as being a combination of companionate love and passionate love. Passionate love is intense longing, and is often accompanied by physiological arousal (shortness of breath, rapid heart rate); companionate love is affection and a feeling of intimacy not accompanied by physiological arousal.

(source : 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love

Johnny's Idea :Love?

Love...isang bagay na kayang gawin ng pangalawa sa pinakamalakas na muscle sa katawan ng tao - ang heart. Ang Love eh, napakaraming meaning, para sa iba..inahalintulad nila ang Love sa rosary kasi marami daw itong mystery (totoo naman siguru yun) heheh, ang iba naman eh ang love daw eh parang river , ewan ku buh, di ku na siguru iisa isahin ang mga meaning ng tao about love basta ang alam ku lang, ito na siguru ang isa sa mga salitang may pinakamaraming meaning (depende na yun sa taong ...nag mamahal-kung anu ang definition nya),pero kung bakit hindi ito nasali sa Guinness..yan ang di ku pa alam(anyway). Marami ding translations ang Love, (may mga translation naman talaga ang mga salita eh, yung mga taong masyadong inlove nga lang eh masyadong nakapokus sa iba't ibang translations ng LOVE), mag pokus muna tayo sa phrase na sinasabi ng maraming tao sa mga mahal nila (kuno..hehheh joke) yung I LOVE YOU:
English - I love you
Afrikaans - Ek het jou lief
Albanian - Te dua
Arabic - Ana behibak (to male)
Arabic - Ana behibek (to female) 
Armenian - Yes kez sirumen
Bambara - M'bi fe
Bangla - Aamee tuma ke bhalo aashi 
Belarusian - Ya tabe kahayu
Bisaya - Nahigugma ako kanimo
Bulgarian - Obicham te
Cambodian - Soro lahn nhee ah
Cantonese Chinese - Ngo oiy ney a 
Catalan - T'estimo
Cheyenne - Ne mohotatse
Chichewa - Ndimakukonda
Corsican - Ti tengu caru (to male) 
Creol - Mi aime jou
Croatian - Volim te
Czech - Miluji te
Danish - Jeg Elsker Dig
Dutch - Ik hou van jou
Esperanto - Mi amas vin
Estonian - Ma armastan sind
Ethiopian - Afgreki'
Faroese - Eg elski teg
Farsi - Doset daram
Filipino - Mahal kita
Finnish - Mina rakastan sinua
French - Je t'aime, Je t'adore
Gaelic - Ta gra agam ort
Georgian - Mikvarhar
German - Ich liebe dich
Greek - S'agapo
Gujarati - Hoo thunay prem karoo choo 
Hiligaynon - Palangga ko ikaw
Hawaiian - Aloha wau ia oi
Hebrew - Ani ohev otah (to female) 
Hebrew - Ani ohev et otha (to male) 
Hiligaynon - Guina higugma ko ikaw 
Hindi - Hum Tumhe Pyar Karte hae
Hmong - Kuv hlub koj
Hopi - Nu' umi unangwa'ta
Hungarian - Szeretlek
Icelandic - Eg elska tig
Ilonggo - Palangga ko ikaw
Indonesian - Saya cinta padamu
Inuit - Negligevapse
Irish - Taim i' ngra leat
Italian - Ti amo
Japanese - Aishiteru
Kannada - Naanu ninna preetisuttene 
Kapampangan - Kaluguran daka
Kiswahili - Nakupenda
Konkani - Tu magel moga cho
Korean - Sarang Heyo
Latin - Te amo
Latvian - Es tevi miilu
Lebanese - Bahibak
Lithuanian - Tave myliu
Malay - Saya cintakan mu / Aku cinta padamu 
Malayalam - Njan Ninne Premikunnu
Mandarin Chinese - Wo ai ni
Marathi - Me tula prem karto
Mohawk - Kanbhik
Moroccan - Ana moajaba bik
Nahuatl - Ni mits neki
Navaho - Ayor anosh'ni
Norwegian - Jeg Elsker Deg
Pandacan - Syota na kita!!
Pangasinan - Inaru Taka
Papiamento - Mi ta stimabo
Persian - Doo-set daaram
Pig Latin - Iay ovlay ouyay
Polish - Kocham Ciebie
Portuguese - Eu te amo
Romanian - Te iubesc
Russian - Ya tebya liubliu
Scot Gaelic - Tha gra'dh agam ort 
Serbian - Volim te
Setswana - Ke a go rata
Sign Language - ,\,,/ (represents position of fingers when signing'I Love You')
Sindhi - Maa tokhe pyar kendo ahyan 
Sioux - Techihhila
Slovak - Lu`bim ta
Slovenian - Ljubim te
Spanish - Te quiero / Te amo
Swahili - Ninapenda wewe
Swedish - Jag alskar dig
Swiss-German - Ich lieb Di
Tagalog - Mahal kita
Taiwanese - Wa ga ei li
Tahitian - Ua Here Vau Ia Oe
Tamil - Nan unnai kathalikaraen
Telugu - Nenu ninnu premistunnanu 
Thai - Chan rak khun (to male)
Thai - Phom rak khun (to female) 
Turkish - Seni Seviyorum
Ukrainian - Ya tebe kahayu
Urdu - mai aap say pyaar karta hoo 
Vietnamese - Anh ye^u em (to female) 
Vietnamese - Em ye^u anh (to male) 
Welsh - 'Rwy'n dy garu
Yiddish - Ikh hob dikh
Yoruba - Mo ni fe


nabasa mu buh lahat...ang dami noh 
nabanggit ku kanina na ang LOVE eh isang bagay na kayang ipakita ng puso, actually di naman talaga yung puso ang may pakana ng lahat eh... yung utak talaga yun--kasi ang utak ang nagbibigay ng command sa iba't ibang bahagi ng katawan natin, but sabihin nalang natin na another level of interpretation nalng nakin ito sa topic natin ngayun, hehehhe, anyway nasabi kung misteryo kasi maraming nagagawa ang isang tao pag siya ay inlove (kuno..heheh) kagaya ng magpaka martyr (kagaya nila padre Burgos at...sino nga ba yong iba....basta) , pwede ring nagpapatiwakal ang isang tao kapag siya ay inlove o di naman kaya eh pumapatay  at ang lahat ng yun eh...nagawa nila sa dahil kamo ...inlove sila and nagawa nila yun out of Love (what ever)..,anyway...masasabi din itong isang misteryo kasi sa dami ng definition nito , di mu na malaman kung alin ang tunay( diba?...tingin ku lang yun hah..) at dahil sa misteryong ito, kahit na ipagsama mu pa si Sherlock Holmes, Detective Conan, at L na kilala sa reasoning ability nila ay ...hindi kayang isolve ang misteryo ng LOVE... ^^


-Lockheart